Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LALA SHAKEEL-UR-REHMAN versus DR. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF CHOHAN


Sections 54, (& ()) and Civil 63 Civil Procedures (v. 1908), O. VI, R15 AUTHS Act (X73 of 1873), Sections 4 and 7 of the Public Representation Sections 54 and 55 of the Act Don't follow. The petitioner's claim in 1976 that defendants could not be allowed to raise such objections, which they did not raise in the written statement, should be considered and obliged to consider the re-election of the self-affirming election tribunal. Whether or not it complies with the terms of section 4 and of 55. Representation of the Public Act, 1976, if not then a preventive proceeding under section 63 may be raised at any stage of the legal proceeding, the present proceedings were at an early stage, thus, such application The rights of the parties were not prejudiced by the filing. Such a request, although not restricted, was irrelevant and unhelpful for that purpose.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Mehrab Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.