Section 5, filth and section 14, suit for recovery of money filed by the plaintiff were dismissed by the Family Court for non-availability of jurisdiction, initially by the Family Court. , And was excluded from the question of jurisdiction. , Neither the question was raised in the defendant's written statement nor claimed by any party, the trial court overlooked the fact that even if it had any to entertain it. Even if there was no jurisdiction, the plaintiff's family needed to return the plaintiff. The court had special jurisdiction to entertain the matter referred to in the schedule of section 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Court Act, 1993, where, among other matters, the case related to Dwyer was also included in the schedule. Due to the marital disputes of the family court, a special hearing scheduled in the schedule was scheduled and the decision was rejected and the decision was sent to the family y with the court directing the case to proceed accordingly. Is with
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2009
