Section 13 Tenant Defendant's request to dismiss the tenant was defended; on the other hand, the leaseholder submitted the non-residual rent arrears to the tenant while denying the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. And ordered to pay the next monthly rent ten successive dates. In the constitutional jurisdiction of the tenant controller, the tenant inquired before the High Court, which allowed the application by the tenant's High Court that the sale of the house was a contract in this case. Was run in his favor. That he had already filed a lawsuit for the specific performance of the said contract and that in the event of a final decision on the suit, the rent controller had no jurisdiction to collect the rent, etc. To order To create any interest or even charge on property in dispute; that contrary to the law in England, the law in Pakistan did not recognize any difference between legal and equal property. That the contract of sale did not award the person to whom such agreement was made, and in fact it gave him the right to sue only such title and, moreover, to a third such contract. The rights of the parties are not affected. The person involved in the case has so far obtained a specific performance order in his favor when claiming ownership of the property, denying such person the title of the landlord or the landlord in any way Cannot be heard to lose the benefits of being born or born
