The appellant's convictions in the Preacher's Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F Wires of Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, meant that every citizen had the right to the protection of his life and property and, in the end, he was entitled to any purpose. Had to bear arms. That the Islamist Ordinance, 1965, which was compiled under the Arms Ordinance 1965, and that there was no need to provide a license for the supply of licenses, and to impose annual fees for the grant of licenses. Was also not in accordance with the integration of Islam, the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and there were no restrictions on the protection of arms as well as the protection of honor and property, but as stated in the preamble to the ordinance. It has been stated that the purpose of this ordinance is to strengthen the law relating to it. The sale, transportation, bearing or seizure of weapons for military stores was shown to regulate the possession of weapons, etc., for the purpose of ordinance, and thus to identify illicit use. ? People were properly protected, they rejected federal law court's decision, intervention was rejected by Supreme Court rules
