Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, ABBOTTABAD versus FAZAL-UR-REHMAN

Section 5 Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Section 54 Timeline Appeal for Delay in Current Affairs, was passed by the Senior Civil Judge on 16 2 2000 and filed before the High Court on 19 8 2000. Was returned to dispose of some objections before the appeal was resubmitted on 2000, or the ground for the late condolences before 1 4 2000 was that the appellant's advice clerk. Did not bring this fact into his knowledge and it was later learned by the lawyer that the file falls on the record of the matters to be dealt with, which was purchased on 3 4 2003, Was founded as, condolences to the request for a delay was lacking in many cases. Delays from 3 to 4000 to 10 6000 were not taken into account, it was appellant who contacted his lawyer to ascertain the result of his appeal which the High Court has rightly time-barred. Was rejected accordingly. Such situations

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mirza MUHAMMAD INAYAT SARAF v. Mst. NASIM AKHTAR 2009 SCMR 759
• TAUQEER AHMAD QURESHI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2009 PLD 760
• POST MASTER-GEN1rRAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR v. LIAQUAT ALI 2009 SCMR 763
• TANVEER SHAUKAT v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NAROWAL 2009 SCMR 764
• AZMAT v. State 2009 PLD 768
• SECRETARY FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD v. MUHAMMAD ZAMAN, EX-INSPECTOR, I.B., ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 769
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, ABBOTTABAD v. GOHAR-UR-REHMAN ABBASI 2009 SCMR 771
• Dr. NIGHAT BIBI, PHYSICIAN, GENERAL MEDICINE, PIMS, ISLAMABAD v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 775

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocate from Warah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes