Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE


The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) study under section 110 56 / proceedings55 states that under section 110/55, CCPC, without waiting for the outcome of pending litigation against the applicants. It was filed prematurely, cannot be prosecuted. As per the habit, the warrant is being arrested under trial under CRPC, Section 110/55, in which case, the proceedings were terminated:
1980 P Cr. L J 953

[Karachi]

Before Muhammad Zahoorul Haq, J

NAZIR AHMAD‑Applicant

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 366 of 1979, heard on 19th November, 1979.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑---

--‑‑S. 561‑A read with S. 110/55‑Quashment of proceedings‑ Contention that complaint under S. 110/55, Cr. P. C. having been filed premature without waiting for results of cases pending against applicant, he could not be held a criminal by habit to warrant proceedings against him under S. 110/55, Cr. P. C.‑Contention, held, correct‑Proceedings quashed, in circumstances:

Syed Madad All Shah for Appellant.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 19th November, 1979.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Madad Ali Shah has pointed out that in the complaint dated Ah March, 1979 submitted at Market Police Station, Hyderabad under section 110/55, Cr. P. C. out of the 8 cases cited for proving that the appellant was habitual Gunda and Badmash or a smoker of charas or had no other ostensible means of subsistence, Case No 1 has been discharged, cases Nos. 2‑3 under section 379, 380, P. P. C. are still pending. Even the case of Charas is still pending while the case of house trespass has been compromised. Case under section 506, P. P. C. has also compromised and Else case under Sind Crimes Control Act has been quashed by the High 5'ourt. Certified true copies have been produced. The, case under ,actions 353, 225 is pending and the last case shown under section 13‑D Of Arms Ordinance is still pending. It could not be, therefore, said that the applicant is by habit a criminal as the habit requires the proof of conviction in some cases.

In these circumstances, it is clear that complaint under section 110/55, Cr. P. C. has been filed premature without waiting for the results of those uses and there can be led no evidence to sustain these proceedings.

In these circumstances, proceedings instituted under section 110/55 Cr . P C. on 30th March, 1979 were without any substance, and are therefore, quashed. No one had appeared for the State.

Proceedings quashed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Kharan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.