SARDAR MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN NASIR versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD ISRAR TAREEN
Sections 52, 55 (3) and 63 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, R 15 and Section 139 Election Petition were challenged on the basis of petitioner's verification of the retention of the election petition on the ground that the applicant. Did not comply. The mandatory provisions of Section 55 (3) of the Representation People Act 1976 and the election application of O VI, R 15, CPC were not endorsed under which paragraph number of the petition could be explained in relation to the application There were paragraphs. The applicant ified with his knowledge and verified the information he received and proved true. In addition, the documents associated with the application were neither signed by the applicant nor were they validated according to the requirements of the law, which required verification of the application as well as attachment. OVI, R 15, should be done under the provisions of CPC, was not complied with, was a fatal defect in the case of the applicant and the application was required to be specifically dismissed as well as the documents associated with the applicant. Has failed to impose mandatory sanctions. The provisions of the law, the election petition were rejected, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
