Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 203 D & 203 DDaz Qazf \, is responsible for `` Trader li '', the trial court has directed against the defendant / accused under section 11 of the Compensation (Enforcement Head) Ordinance 1979. After completing the charges and the noodle, the formal status of the litigation case, in order to defy the order to acquit him, the subsequent decision has to be unrealistic, disrespectful and shocking. So being immoral and disrespectful cannot be interfered with. The fact that someone else was likely to issue a notice to the defendant was not enough

Related judgments — Federal Shariat Court, 2010

• Syed MUHAMMAD JAMALUDDIN KAZMI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan 2010 PLD 221
• GHULAM YASIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 221
• MOHTARMA BENAZIR BHUTTO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Islamabad 2010 PLD 229
• Mst. SHEHNAZ alias ASMA alias RANI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 231
• ZAFAR IQBAL v. ZAREENA BIBI 2010 PCrLJ 604
• ABDUL MAJEED alias MAKHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 620
• GHULAM QADIR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 636
• IJAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 862

All Federal Shariat Court judgments of 2010 →

tax advocates from Ziarat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes