Section 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 265K Accusers / Applicants of Illegal Settlement, who claimed to be the owner of private confidential land, alleged that the defendants seized the illegal part of the said land. For which they have lodged a complaint under Section 3 of the Act. Respondents of the Disposition Act, 2005, had moved the petition under Section 265K, CR PC that the trial court dismissed the complaint filed by the complainant, record of the respondents' review and report of authority. Disclosed, allowing the application of. The complainants have an area on which the defendants raised the boundary wall and it was claimed by the respondents that the location of the land was not established. And the record did not reflect the real source, but the defendants had taken possession of the land in dispute after accepting official responsibility, however it was not clear that the complainant's land had definite boundaries and the defendant complained. Had crossed the land of the recipient. At the trial, the applicant / complainant's plea was not justified in dismissing the petition under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, the inappropriate order was set aside and Mukhtarikar was directed. That he should hand over the land to the applicants / complainants. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
