Sections 302, 337H (ii), 147, 148 and 149 Qatil appreciated the witnesses and the confession of the two evidence agreed on every aspect of the commission of the crime, the medical evidence was clear. The lawyer for the accused, who is compatible with the ocular evidence, failed to identify any material contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses, and he also could not identify any contradictory evidence in the ocular evidence, and in the medical evidence the prosecutor established the evidence of the circumstances. And took legal action against it. Reliable evidence Prosecution witnesses Reliable evidence of the prosecution's witnesses proved the recovery of the rifle and iron pipe, although they belonged to the accused, but they were acquitted. The accused did not deny the evidence. That his body was recovered from his body. The house motive was proved by the ocular evidence The witnesses were interested or hostile There was no hard and fast rule that the evidence of the relevant witnesses should not be relied upon when they tried to convict, convict and punish the accused at trial. Without a shadow, he was able to establish his case against the accused. Under the circumstances, maintained
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
