The accusation against the accused in the testimony of Section 302 murder was alleged that he strangled the victim in the presence of the complainant, but a post-mortem report submitted by the doctor, which was examined, was also based on ocular evidence. The contrary was because the doctor specifically mentioned that the deceased had died because of the hangings due to the luggage The doctor was not charged with any animosity against the doctor who had so much about finding him. Believed that the doctor could not be buried aside, a situation that raised a lot of suspicion about the incident. As he had alleged. All the witnesses presented by the prosecution witness were close relatives of the deceased, two of the deceased's brothers and one of the deceased's aunts all said that the three witnesses testified that they were present at the time of the incident and that the deceased was in their presence. Was killed. Given the testimony given by the witnesses why they did not make any attempt to save the deceased or to make the charges, the claim of the witnesses' presence at the time of the incident was highly doubtful that this was not credible. In the presence of his two brothers and an uncles state lawyer, the empty-handed accused was able to kill the victim in view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt and the trial court did not allow the accused to prosecute and convict.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
