Find a Lawyer

SHAHID ALIAS GATOR versus STATE

The defendant did not press the request for bail on section 497 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), section 392/34 robbery, and instead requested a directive to expedite the trial. The complainant was the only important witness in the case whose decision to grant bail was decided for the purpose of investigation, the plea hearing was dismissed, however, the trial court was instructed to make the charge and specify Be sure to check the complainant within the period.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD NASIR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 704
• SHAH MURAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 708
• SHAHID UMER v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT 2010 MLD 708
• NESAR AHMED SIDDIQUI v. MICRO ENGINEERINGS (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLD 713
• BARKAT ALI SHAIKH v. QURBAN SHAIKH 2010 MLD 716
• PAKISTAN PAPER PRODUCTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, REVENUE DIVISION 2010 PTD 716
• GHULAM HYDER RIND v. State 2010 YLR 717
• LIAQAT v. State 2010 PCrLJ 717

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Peshawar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes