Section 395 Definition of Evidence Defined benefit of the suspect, the accused was shown to the witnesses, the identity parade was, in the circumstances, suspected and had lost his credibility, the prosecutor complained to the complainant at the time of the identification parade. Had, in his evidence, dismissed that he could not say whether the prosecution witness in the court was the same whether the prosecution witness testified on behalf of the defendant at the time of the identification parade. The character was not specifically identified, the prosecution had failed to prove evidence against the accused and it was very difficult to say. That the accused was the person who had committed the other partner can be appreciated in conjunction with the view that the accused was in favor of the accused to the crime, certainly at the appropriate point in the prosecution case. In order to give the suspect the benefit of the doubt, the Secured Administration of Criminal Justice was called in. The accused voluntarily rushed the police party to his house and presented the cash before the robbery, however, it did not come into evidence, The house from which the accused presented the cash was in the exclusive possession of the accused, no witnesses identified the accused in the identification parade, the prosecution was unable to prove the evidence against the accused. Beyond reasonable doubt, even the slightest suspicion in the case of the prosecution should go to the accused's side, the trial court was not allowed to give the accused the benefit of the doubt in the trial, because on the basis of that evidence, the participant The accused was acquitted, the prosecution failed to prove charges against the accused, he was punished
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
