Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQUE AHMED versus STATE

Articles 392 and 353 Definition of Evidence Defendant's Witness Statements The plaintiff's witness's explicit statement regarding the presence of the suspect in a stolen car and leaving it injured during a raid was not specifically denied. It will be understood that he was admitted during his trial that he was allegedly making conflicting claims of contradictory defense claims at various stages and that he was involved in the commission of the crime. The accused used to recover the pistol and recovered from the scene of the crime. At any stage the dispute was settled by them, both the accused were habitually recorded as guilty, that is, the accused was charged with robbery by means of compelling and credible evidence and in the circumstances the perpetrators. Punishments and punishments were retained.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Hakeem MOHSIN JAN 2010 YLR 226
• Mst. DARYA KHATOON v. LOHAR PANHWAR 2010 PCrLJ 229
• ALI GOHAR v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LARKANA RANGE 2010 MLD 231
• Miss RAKSHANDA KHATOON v. NAWAB DIN 2010 CLC 232
• Mst. UMMATULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Town Planning, Karachi 2010 PLD 236
• Khawaja MUHAMMAD USMAN v. SHAUKAT ALI 2010 YLR 239
• CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director Airport Management v. BLAZON ADVERTISING through Chairman 2010 CLC 243
• ANWAR RAZA alias MANNAH v. State 2010 YLR 244

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous lower court advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes