Find a Lawyer

IMDAD ALI JARWAR versus STATE

Section 13 (e) Appreciating the possession of a weapon The evidence of the prosecution witnesses was found to be complete, and there was no material contradiction in the evidence of the witnesses by the accused complainant's lawyer, who was a police officer. There was no enmity. The witnesses were good witnesses like the others, in the present case the prosecution witness had no enmity with the accused and the said witness was also credible and credible and no material contradiction was found in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. Proved his case against the accused beyond any shadow. Doubt, at the trial, the trial decision was not retained

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• GULRAIZ AHMED RAZA v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2010 YLR 2977
• AMJAD AMEEN v. State 2010 YLR 2993
• MUJAHID ALI v. State 2010 YLR 3010
• MUHAMMAD MITHAL alias MITHJO v. State 2010 YLR 3029
• MUHAMMAD HANEEF v. State 2010 YLR 3083
• Syed SIRAJ HASSAN v. MUHAMMAD TAHIR 2010 YLR 3109
• MUSHTAQ v. State 2010 YLR 3117
• SADRUDDIN ABDULLAH GANGJI v. State 2010 YLR 3168

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Diamer lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes