FAHAM DIL KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. (K.P.K.) THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PESHAWAR
Sections 3, 6, 7 and 10 impose annual incremental penalties after the applicant charges a charge sheet and withholds inquiries, accusing him of misconduct, misconduct, embezzlement, misappropriation of public funds. He was later fined for holding three-year increments. Etc. There was no proper method of inquiry by the department, which did not lead to inquiry in the form of questionnaires, which led to the dismissal. The authority referred to the period during payment of defamatory penalty to the appellant, which was a clear violation of the relevant law / rule, the proper sanction was not obtained in respect of the drawing of advance money from the competent authority. No embezzlement / abuse was used. Appellant proved against the impeachment order, which, in the circumstances, was invalid and in the eyes of the law, the appellant had in the circumstances filed a service tribunal, which was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
