Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH PRESIDENT versus RANA MUHAMMAD ASHIQ KHAN

Section 42 Civil Service Suite Declaration Maintenance Suite was permanently adjudicated by the trial court and the appellate court, the defendant / bank filed a review against it and it was said that the adjudication decision and the accused / bank's The lawyer did not challenge the merits of the case, but merely submitted that the case was ineligible because the restitution order could not be granted because the owner and servant of the parties in the relationship were allowed to control the organization and the government. Was administered, its employees' services will be governed by an order of legal rules. If employees were violated by the rules or were illegitimate for any other reason, the dismissal of such employees could be terminated by a civil court, while exercising its jurisdiction over the law referenced by the plaintiff's lawyer. Accordingly, simultaneous decisions and orders were rejected

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GHULAM RASOOL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SAHIWAL 2010 MLD 88
• NAZIR AHMAD v. GHULAM MUSTAFA 2010 MLD 89
• MUHAMMAD SULEMAN v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, SAHIWAL 2010 PCrLJ 89
• MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ v. CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION 2010 YLR 91
• M. RASHEED CHAUDHRY v. Mst. CHANDRI 2010 MLD 95
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE, FESCO, FAISALABAD v. NAYAB HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 95
• MUZAFFAR ALI KHAN v. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman 2010 CLC 95
• TAHIR HUSSAIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Defence 2010 PLC(CS) 101

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Khair Pur Mir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes