AMIR BUX versus SONO KHAN

Sections 15 and 16? Read with the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 5 Article 158? Objection to the award? Need to file within 30 days with the award information? Filed objections to such excesses? Time? The ban? The time cannot be extended under section 158, under the Limitation Act, 1908, under section 5 of such act? [Award]

P L D 1979 Karachi 45

Before Dorab Patel, J

Haji AMIR BUX‑Applicant versus

SONO KHAN‑Respondent

Revision Application Nor, 244 of 1967, decided on 7th May, 1973.

--Arbitration Acts (X of 1940)

‑ Ss. 15 & 16‑Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5 read with Art. 158‑Objections to Award‑To be filed within 30 days from date of knowledge of award‑Objections filed beyond such period of limitation‑Time‑barred‑Time under S. 158, Limitation Act, 1908, held, cannot be extended under S. 5 of such Act.‑[Award].

Bhola Nath Mallick v. Mahadev Mallick A I R 1952 Cal. 226 ; Mehboob Alam v. Sheikh Mumtaz Ahmed P L D 1966 Lab. 276 and Thai Development Auhority v. Nisar Ahmed Qureshi P L D 1962 Lab. 830 ref.

Zafar Alam Khan for Applicant. M. M. Pirzada for Respondent.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

famous high court advocate from Mansehra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team