RANA MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MALIK MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ
A. VIII, R11 Punjab Pre-Empathy Act (IX of 1991), Section 17 A case has been filed for pre-arrest in connection with the disputed property in respect of the right to influence. The request was dismissed, the CPC requested a dismissal. Regarding the case that the right before the possession of the plaintiff was abolished under section 17 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, the defendant further asserted that the premier had acquired a portion of his property in whole or in part The whole thing was separated on which it was owned. Claims for pre-discrimination rights, dismissal of their right to terminate claim dismissed Plaintiff's plaintiff was a co-partner despite having sold a portion of its stake in the plaintiff and shared facilities And the trial was at its earliest stage where the evidence was not yet registered. A trial court order has been issued under which it has sought the defendant under R11, R11. Dismissed the request, CPC was unsure of was invalidated by lower court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
