A. XXI, R 58 Decision-making property attachment, decision on non-availability of cases Objection to articles attached during execution of order was based on the fact that he was the owner of the articles and not the decision-making player. Did. The applicant was that the executive court did not set matters to decide its objections, no first evidence of ownership of the justification was kept on the executive court record Original receipts were presented for the first time in a review petition before the High Court. In fact, which faced such receipts on the ground, it was suspected that the High Court did not execute any illegal interference or wrong reading / record-reading, dismissing the application for a court-ordered objection. Went, providing opportunities to prepare the case and present evidence to the parties Was not obliged to conduct regular inquiries by. In the absence of first evidence, the authority to briefly reject the request for objection, and where a separation was found between the applicant and the decision makers. The Executive Court found the applicant and decision mate to be mutual, which was floating even at the court-approved record level, and was reviewed by the High Court. Deleted in range
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
