SYED MUHAMMAD MURTAZA ZAIDI versus MOTOR REGISTRATION AUTHORITY
Article 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25, 70 (4), 77, 141, 142 (a), 199 and Fourth Schedule, St. No 52 Constitutional application to tax on luxury vehicles imposed by the provincial government on automobiles But on the basis of merit, the applicants demanded that no such tax could be imposed on the wrap of luxury and that such tax was imposed by the Federal Legislative List, which prohibited the use of a special engine vehicle and. It was to be enjoyed. Electricity, which was subject to tax, and such taxes could be imposed on the production capacity of any plant, machinery, etc., so that the High Court, No. 52 of the Federal Legislature's List, refused to produce the power to operate the engine, and Had brought This case fails to deal with discrimination in any way within the production view of Entry No. 52 of the Federal Legislature's List of Constitutional Applicants, as all of the engineered vehicles of the given engineers are obliged to pay taxes from a certain date. Was similarly targeted across the board to a standard that was not shown to be based on any irrational standard, but rather the use and enjoyment of large-power engines. Was conditional. The purpose of the tax, which was rationally established despite the model petition and brand pattern, was dismissed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
