Article 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VI, R 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Amendment to the Case for Special Performance The plaintiff dismissed the request when evidence was being recorded in the case. Under OVI, R 17, the CPC sought plaintiff's modification to claim that his claim was based on a written contract rather than a written contract of sale, the trial court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff. The Second Appellate Court also dismissed. , The plaintiff filed a constitutional petition. The suit was brought by the plaintiff on the basis of an alleged oral agreement of sale and when the case was at the recording stage and a witness was filed by him, he wanted to present a fact. The sale was based on a written agreement The plaintiff never claimed that their claim was based on a written agreement and that the original as a participant was brought to the wrong place somewhere in the plaintiff's petition for modification. It was pointed out by version that it could allow its claim to be grounded in a written agreement such face It cannot be allowed to testify earlier that when its claim was based on an oral sale agreement, the same was affirmed on the charge of contentious items on material question on affidavit, hearing. Could not be, both courts rejected his request for amendment. Their orders were correct and did not demand interference with the constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
