Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMEEN versus KHADIM HUSSAIN

Section 13 Pre-Ruling Rights The evidence for the right-wing victims must be mentioned in the facts below. Both the courts had filed a case in favor of the petitioner, whereby the vendor raised that the former importer had filed the divorce petition. Time and place of creation was not mentioned. Unless all components of history, time and place are mentioned to be satisfied and the evidence cannot be proved by the evidence, the evidence has proved that both the courts have declared material illegal and unlawful. Committed the decision. The premier's case, which failed to prove student credibility under the High Court's law under the amended jurisdiction, makes decisions concerning it, and orders passed in favor of the pre-emptor were dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 2010 CLC 584
• Sayyeda ROBINA SHAHAB NAQVI v. Sayyed SAFDAR HUSSAIN 2010 MLD 585
• QASIR JAVED v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION SADDAR JHELUM 2010 PCrLJ 587
• USAMA JAVAID v. CHAIRMAN, HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION 2010 MLD 588
• Mst. PARVEEN JAHAN v. ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, LAHORE 2010 PLC(CS) 589
• MUHAMMAD SALMAN v. THE STATE 2010 YLR 589
• AFRAHIM SHAKEEL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 589
• ZULFIQAR MUSTAFA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 PCrLJ 590

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes