TASSAWAR RASHEED versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAKWAL
Section 540A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i) (ii), 337F (i) (i) (v) (vi), 337L (ii), 458, 147 and 149 of the Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 199 During the trial of the Constitution application for an individual personal immunity application from the Shuja and the House, the applicant filed an application stating that he was exempted from his personal appearance under Section 540, CRPC. Be given because they had received a work visa to join a foreign job. The trial court said that the petition filed for the trial court and its review petition was also dismissed by the provisions of section 4040 AA, CR PC of the appellate court, in view of the facts of each case. The court was to apply by CP. Appealing to the court to seek exemption from the prosecution of an accused does not end the process, but continues, with the accused having to wait until the appropriate permission for his application. , Because the court did not have to approve the mechanical order trial. The court had to look into the possibility of enforcing the accused's personal attendance at a later stage, but the accused involved in a criminal case who was allowed to waive bail during the trial was voluntarily released. Couldn't allow work. It was impossible for the trial court to properly control its movements. The accused / applicant was not entitled to exemption from attendance during the trial in which the applicant himself prayed and then, without the permission of the trial court departed, his application was dismissed when the accused appeared before the trial court. Was present when he made an exception
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
