Find a Lawyer

AHMED KHAN versus SHOUKAT MEHMOOD

Section 6 Case Pre-Disciplinary Retention Plaintiff claimed that the shopkeeper sold 112 Kanal, 15 Marla land while the Pre-Importer filed a case for printing only 7 Canal and 18 Marl, hence maintaining partial pre-emption case. Was not the case. The court ruled in this case, while the appellate court rejected the plaintiff's position that he was entitled to file a pre-arrest case in relation to the land of his choice, having been misunderstood because by law the former The umpire was not allowed to select a higher section. Leave the earth and the inferior suit to eliminate partial troubles \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• NADEEM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1681
• NAZIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1684
• Dr. HAMID NAWAZ KHOKHAR v. MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, HAFIZABAD 2010 CLC 1685
• Mst. ZAKIA BIBI v. CIVIL JUDGE IST CLASS, MULTAN 2010 CLC 1687
• MUHAMMAD TUFAIL v. State 2010 YLR 1695
• MUHAMMAD ASHIQ v. State 2010 YLR 1695
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1698
• RASHID KAREEM v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2010 YLR 1702

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Khanqah Dogran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes