Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE


Section 57 was read with a life sentence, under section 12 and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302 [as it stands before and after the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972)]. For transportation, events occurring in 1964, then conviction for death or transportation for life, transportation for life under section 57 means that transportation for 20 years, hand reform ordinance, By 1972, the penalties imposed, 1860, were implemented from 14 1972 to 1972, and section 302 was amended to either murder. Article 57 implies death or life imprisonment and life imprisonment means no law of imprisonment of 25 years shall permit punishment for such offense at the time of its commission, beyond the penalty prescribed by law. Could not be the accused. Sentenced to life imprisonment Applicant sentenced to life imprisonment [sentence]

1978 S C M R 292

Present: Qaisar Khan, Muhammad Haleem,

Ghulam Safdar Shah and Karam Elahee Chauhan, JJ

ABDUL REHMAN‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Review Petition No. 8‑R of 1978, decided on 14th May 1978.

(On review from the order of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. K‑22 of 1973, dated the 1st of April 1975, against the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan, Karachi, dated the 10th of August 1971 in Crl. Appeal No. 239 of 1970/Confirmation Case No. 35 of 1970).

(a) Supreme Court Rules 1956‑

---‑O. XXVI‑Review‑‑Petition for review barred by 1119 days Mistake, however, apparent, on face of record and petitioner, an illiterate man, in jail all through‑‑Delay in filing review petition con doned in circumstances.‑‑[Review‑‑‑‑Condonation of delay].

(b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

----Art. 12 and Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302 [as standing before and after enactment of Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)] read with S. 57‑Imprisonment for life‑‑Transportation for life‑Occur rence taking place in 1964, punishment for murder then being death or transportation for life‑Transportation for life under S. 57 meaning transportation for 20 years‑Amendment in Penal Code, 1860, introduced by haw Reforms Ordinance, 1972, with effect from 14‑4‑1972, and according to S. 302 thus amended punishment for murder either death or life imprisonment and life imprisonment according to S. 57 of meaning imprisonment for 25 years‑No law, held, could authorise punishment for an offence by a penalty greater than penalty prescribed by law for such offence at time of its commission and accused could not be sentenced to life imprisonment‑Petitioner's punishment converted to transportation for life.‑[Sentence].

Noor Ahmad Noori, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 14th May 1978.

ORDER

QAISAR KHAN, J.

‑‑Abdul Rehman was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge Hyderabad for the murder of two police officials and by his judgment dated the 6th of June 1970 sentenced to death on both counts. The appeal of the convict was dismissed by the High Court on the 10th of August 1971 and the death sentences, were confirmed The convict filed petition for special leave to appeal in this Court which was granted and this Court by its judgment dated the 1st of April 1975 accepted the appeal to the extent that the death sentences were commuted to life imprisonments.

Abdul Rehman has filed this review petition praying for converting his sentences from life imprisonment to transportation for life. The petition is barred by 1119 days but since the mistake was apparent on the face of the,, record and the petitioner who is an illiterate man was in jail all through we would therefore condone the delay in filing this petition.

Notice had been issued in this case to the Advocate on Record for the State but no body cared to appear despite service. After hearing Mr. Noor Ahmad Noori, Advocate on Record for the petitioner we have come to the conclusion that the review petition deserves acceptance. The occurrence took place in 1964 when punishment for murder was death or transportation for 1 life. Transportation for life under section 57, P. P. C. meant transportation for 20 years. The amendment in the Penal Code was introduced with effect from the 14th of April 1972, by Law Reforms Ordinance XII of 1972. Accord ing to the amended section 302 the punishment for murder was death or life imprisonment and life; imprisonment according to section 57, P. P. C. meant imprisonment for 25 years.

According to Article 12 of the Constitution no law could authorise punishment of a person for an offence by a penalty greater than the penalty prescribed by law for the offence at the time the offence was committed. The accused could not therefore be sentenced to life imprisonment. He bad to be sentenced to transportation for life. We therefore accept this petition and convert the punishment of the petitioner on each of the two counts to transportation for life instead of life imprisonment.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Kalam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.