Find a Lawyer

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. K‑27, K‑112 and K‑113 of 1977, decided on 10th January, 1978.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind Karachi, dated 30th October 1977, in Bail Applications Nos. 641, 841 and 952 of 1977).

‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Leave to appeal to Supreme Court‑Advocate‑General giving undertaking to gel complete challan presented in competent Court by end of month and to get case of co‑accused separated for proceeding a order S. 512, Cr. P. C.‑Petition seeking bail allowed to be withdrawn in circumstances and trial Court directed to expedite trial so as to complete evidence within 6 months Petitioners directed to seek bail from trial Court, if so advised. [Bail].

Imdadally Agha, Advocate and M.I. Memon Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in P. K. 27 of 1977).

Muhammad Hayat Junejo, Senior Advocate and Noor Ahmad Noori, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner (to P. K-112 and P. K.‑113 of 1977).

Zahoorul Haq. Advocate‑General (Sind), Hyder Raza Naqvi, Advocate and S. M: Abbad Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent (in all Petitions)

Date of hearing : 10^th January 1978.

‑The above petitions are allowed to be with drawn on the undertaking having been given by the Advocate‑General, Sind, that a complete challan would be presented in the competent Court by the end of this month and the case of the co‑accused. Jam Sadiq Ali, would be separated and proceedings against him would be taken under section 512, Cr. P. C. Further we would direct the trial Court to expedite the trial so as to complete the recording of the evidence within six months If the petitioners are so advised they can seek bail from the trial Court which would be competent to consider the request on merits in the light of the evidence so recorded.

Subject to the above, the petitions ate dismissed as withdrawn.

Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.