Find a Lawyer

Appeal No. 90 of 1975, decided on 10th March 1976

‑‑ S. 4‑Retirement on own request Contention that retirement applied for under coercion‑No proof‑Mere verbal statement at belated stage, held, not acceptable and interference rejected. [p. 24)4 Abdul Sattar G. Shaikh for Respondent.

.‑Heard the appellant and A. A.‑G. The appellant had himself made application for retirement on 15‑1‑1914. It was accepted by the S. P., Nawabshah on 12‑1‑74. The appellant's depart mental appeal was dismissed by the D. I.‑G. on 18‑9‑74. His review petition to I: G. was dismissed on 1‑5‑75. He filed the present appeal on 21‑7‑75. Since he was allowed to retire on his own request, we find no reason to interfere. There is nothing no record, except the word of the appellant for the first time raised before us, that he was coerced by the S. P. to retire from service. We cannot accept his belated and empty word. He had four days left. The S. P. passed the order on his application to withdraw his retirement application but he failed to do so. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. We accordingly dismiss the appeal with no order for costs.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.