Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM ABID versus VICE-CHANCELLOR B.Z.U, MULTAN

Offer for Admission to the Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Subsidiary Education Phil M. Ph.D. It was enrolled in the Comprehensive Program of MPhil / PhD in 2003 and the new Rules of the MPhil / PhD Program were announced by the University in 2005. Was. Officials said that the M.Phil and Ph.D. were two different programs and that the University Comprehensive Program was not offered and that under the notification in 2005, the new rules were introduced in 2002 over the old rules. The validity record revealed that admission to the MPhil / PhD program was a comprehensive program and the remainder was enrolled. The PhD program was a regulatory measure and did not affect the continuity of the program before students were enrolled in the PhD program. In 2004, the old rules were subjected to the applicant's As well as the new roles the High Court discriminated against, the constitutional petition was granted and the authorities were instructed to apply the old rules applicable to the MPhil / PhD program in this case. The applicant's constitutional application was dealt with accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• TAHZEEB SHAHID alias QAVI v. State 2010 YLR 1513
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1515
• ATIQA MUZAMMIL v. MUHAMMAD UMAR FAROOQ 2010 YLR 1519
• SHAH ZAMAN v. State 2010 MLD 1521
• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1523
• MUHAMMAD INZMAM v. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE 2010 YLR 1525
• JAVAID IQBAL v. State 2010 MLD 1527
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. ABDUL LATIF 2010 MLD 1530

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes