Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUNIR AHMAD versus STATE


Section 5 Pen5, read with Section Code 325 / X34, Section 4 324/3434 Criminal Investigation Cases, the aggrieved person has sent notice to the complainant and the request of the person confirming such person is guarantor. , Compromise its affiliates. Trial conditions, accepted and applicants acquitted

1977 S C M R 51

Present : Muhammad Gul and Muhammad Akram, JJ

MUNIR AHMAD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners/Appellants

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 1976, in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 224 of 1976, decided on 11th June 1976.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 18‑3‑1976, in Criminal Revision No. 976 of 1965).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ S. 345 read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 324/34‑Compound ing of offences‑incident taking place 12 years ago arid parties having compounded offence‑Notice sent to complainant and such person confirming offence having been compounded with petitioners, his mohallahdars‑Compromise, in circumstances of case, accepted and petitioners accused acquitted.

S. M. Idrees, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Masud Akludr (absent) (Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record appeared on 11‑6‑1976 with permission of Court) for Petitioners/Appellants.

Nemo for the State.

Complainant in person.

Dates of hearing : 10th and 11th June 1976.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD GUL, J.---‑

This petition is barred by 23 days. However, we condone the delay for the reasons stated in the application for condonation.

The petitioners were convicted by the trial Court under section 307/34, P. P. C. for murderous assault on Abdul Wahid and sentenced to three years R. I. each. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge altered their conviction to that under section 324/34, P. P. C. and reduced the sentence to one and an half year R. I. Their revision in the High Court remained pending for about 10 years but was ultimately dismissed. The petitioners now seek leave to appeal.

The incident took place about 12 years ago. It appears that the parties; have compounded the offence. A notice was issued to Abdul Wahid. He was; complainant in the case and victim of the assault who confirmed that he has compounded the offence with the petitioners who are his mohallahdars.

Having regard to the circumstances we accept the compromise between the parties, convert this petition into appeal, accept the same on the basis of the composition between the parties and acquit the petitioners. They shall be released forthwith unless required in some other case.

Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Dina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.