Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIR versus UMER HAYAT

Article 199 Filing a civil case before the trial court for a veil of constitutional jurisdiction Effective Applicant's disclosure did not disclose the filing of a civil suit in a constitutional petition, before the trial court held the same order under Article 199. The relief given was constitutional arbitration and the applicant should approach the High Court with clean hands. There was considerable scope for the applicant's denial of assistance seeking the constitutional petition to cover the facts of the fact that the civil court did not disclose the filing of a civil suit.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MAHMOOD alias MOODA v. State 2010 YLR 1789
• SHARIFAN BANO v. MUHAMMAD BASHIR 2010 CLC 1790
• MUNEER HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1793
• Syed MUHAMMAD MURTAZA ZAIDI v. MOTOR REGISTRATION AUTHORITY 2010 PTD 1797
• Malik TANVEER ALI v. Sardar ALI IMAM 2010 YLR 1799
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. MUNIR AHMED 2010 PCrLJ 1799
• MAQSOOD AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASHIQ 2010 MLD 1799
• MASOOD IQBAL GONDAL v. RETURNING OFFICER CONSTITUENCY NA-68, SARGODHA 2010 CLC 1802

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Warburton lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes