JAN MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 10 (3) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 3 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Rehabilitation of Allotted Land Member, Review Settlement by the Board of Revenue Aspects of Land Allotted to Father Without accepting. Under Section 10 (3) of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912, the applicant was re-initiated for a period of 15 years under the lease scheme of 15 years and it was given to the respondent under the `brave award scheme. The applicant accepted the Appeal Additional Commissioner (Revenue) filed by the applicant and the defendant filed a time-bound review petition before the Member, Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue approved Did not publicize the aspect of the detention and disposed of the revision request through a revision order, which was challenged by the High Court in connection with the limitation. The matter must first be considered before a court or tribunal to decide on eligibility that has not been considered in the present case. The case was an outright illegal action by which it violated the law that was resolved because the matter was hurried because it did not accept the limitation, so the interests of justice. It was demanded that the limits be revised. After noting the facts of the amendment submission restriction, the Board of Revenue will decide between the parties on the basis of qualifications. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
