Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FIDA HUSSAIN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 applicants, accused of murder, sat empty in the panchayat to resolve a marital dispute when the co-accused suddenly shocked the deceased and demanded that the applicants No such intention is known. There was no cooperation from him as his co-accused in the sudden and unprecedented case, he demanded further investigation, in which case, bail was allowed, [bail]
1977 P Cr. L J 821

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Farukee, J

FIDA HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4530 of 1976, decided on 30th November 1976.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑

S. 497‑Petitioners, accused of murder, sitting empty handed in panchayat to settle matrimonial dispute when co‑accused suddenly picking up a hatchet and causing blows to deceased --Contention that petitioners having no knowledge about any such intention on part of their co‑accused as displayed by him in sudden and unpremeditated affair with no contribution from their side it called for a further inquiry‑Contention, held, correct‑Bail allowed, in circumstances.‑[Bail].

Raja Muhammad Ayub Khan for Petitioners.

Ch. Muhammad Hanif for the State.

JUDGMENT

Fida Husain and Riaz Husain petitioners are being prosecuted in a case under section 302/34, P. P. C. and on being refused the concession of bail they had approached this Court on the ground that they were sitting empty handed in the Panchayat to settle this matrimonial dispute when in the course of the verbal wrangle that ensued Ghulam Abbas, their companion is said to have suddenly picked up a small hatchet and caused blows to the deceased.

2. The contention that they had no knowledge about any such intention on his part as displayed by him in this sudden and unpremeditated affair with no contribution from their side would certainly call for a further enquiry.

3. Without expression of any opinion on the merits of the case I allow this petition with a direction that the two petitioners Fida Husain and Riaz Husain shall be released from custody on their furnishing a bond each in tile sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rs. ten thousand) with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Sargodha.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Musakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.