Claims 42 and 54 of the suit and the injunction permanently barring the defendants from claiming that they were the owners of the suit land and their possession to the extent of their shares. And that the defendants were not entitled to interfere with their possession, the trial court and the appellate court in the case had ruled out the suit through the plaintiffs' counsel, on the strength of this decree, that they did not claim exclusive possession of khasra no. But only until the proper distribution by Mats and Limitations did the court obtain an order protecting its possession and the civil court's order before the Revenue Court Counsel for the plaintiffs in the division proceedings Will not be used as a barrier. Plaintiffs 'lawyers were brought on record, they would not assert approval of their review request; the review request was, in the circumstances, resolved in light of the commitment made by the plaintiffs' counsel at the bar, that the decision / The decree will never be used as a barrier before the Revenue Officers for proper distribution according to the law.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
