REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD NAVEED HASHMI
Article 212 (3) was dismissed on a charge of corruption as a judicial officer on a charge of restoration of a civil service. The service tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the judicial officer and restored him to employment, if the judicial officer had a permanent reputation. Being corrupt, the same vacancy and the annual intelligence reports could not be decided even if it was the only tool to assess the credibility of the corrupt otherwise the annual secret reports were silent in this regard during the posting of the deposed judicial officer. Had there been any complaint, the position would have been different and some remarks could have been given in the annual intelligence reports, the Judicial Officer was never given any advice to improve the scope, the competent officer did not agree with the inquiry officer's recommendations. The Judicial Officer was deported but argued that the one who was an academic, O authorized officer could be logically correct but not legally. There must be some evidence to prove the allegation of corruption, the authority failed to record anything that could prove such a serious allegation, the inquiry officer examined all the evidence contained in it. Had checked. The Judicial Officer was dismissed on the basis of support and conviction of the allegations of corruption, which could not be set aside and was properly brought under consideration and the Service Tribunal prosecution filed a Judicial Officer service against the Corruption Tribunal. Was unable to confirm the charge of All the evidence for the use and wisdom of intelligence is in accordance with the law and the evidence
