Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RAJA MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION


Warning public servant was exchanged and warned to abstain from some activities. Such warning census is not penalized.

1977 P L C [G. S. T.1 139

[Federal Service Tribunal]

Persent Muhammad Daud Khan, Chairman and Jehangir Shah

Jogazai, Member

Raja MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

Versus

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN,

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

Appeal No. 155 (R) of 1976, decided on 5th November 1976.

Civil services‑

----Warning ‑‑ Civil servant transferred and warned to desist from certain activities‑Such warning not a censure" and not a "penalty Government Servants Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, r. 3.

(b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)‑

----- S. 4(1) (b)‑Appeal‑Transfer order‑‑Not appeal able.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD DAUD KHAN (CHAIRMAN).

‑‑Raja Mohammad Ashraf, an Assistant Teacher. Cantonment Primary School, Saddar Bazar, Rawalpindi, took ' up on himself in his capacity as President of the Cantonment Board Teachers' Association, to report against Director of Military Lands and Can tonment, for forging signatures of Station Commander on the substituted list of selected teachers. Thereafter he approached the Chief of Staff with the same complaint.

He was charge‑sheeted and after consideration of his defence‑statement, which was found unsatisfactory, he was served with a show‑cause notice dated 12th June, 1976. The charge was as to misconduct under rule 3(b) of the Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973.

On 25th September 1976 it was decided to transfer him to Shorkot Cantt. School. He was also warned to desist from such activities in future. He filed this appeal against his transfer and alleged warning.

Although censure is a minor penalty, the warning in the form it was, given is not tantamount to any penalty imposed. He was just directed to desist from misconduct in future. It cannot be deemed to be censure for the acts committed within the meaning of Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973.

As to transfer, section 4(1)(b) of the Service Tribunal3 Act, 1973 denies appeal against such postings. Wording of the section that no appeal right of shall lie against determination of a departmental authority deciding fitness of a person to be appointed or to hold a particular post, negatives right of appeal. The appeal, therefore, is incompetent under both the heads. It is dismissed in limine.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Kunjah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.