Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB KHAN versus ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD THROUGH SECRETARY

Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Provincial Assembly, approaching the High Court after the close of the electoral process, was rejected by the Returning Officer for failing to sign the petitioner's request that the relevant. Officer; Candidate interested due to non-supply of power at the polling station, tampered with the record and was counted in the light of a lantern. The provisions of Article 199 of the Constitution were made during any election process. Could also be requested to challenge irregularities. Elections can be challenged before the Election Tribunal, such questions cannot be brought by the High Court / Constitutional jurisdiction in which the election tribunal has already decided to decide such questions after recording of the evidence. Had acquired exclusive jurisdiction for. r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• PETROSIN CORPORATION LTD. v. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Managing Director 2010 CLD 15
• MUHAMMAD SHAMIM v. Mst. NISAR FATIMA 2010 SCMR 18
• SIKANDAR HAYAT v. HASINA SHEIKH 2010 PLD 19
• ISMAEEL v. State 2010 SCMR 27
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. SALEHUN alias SALEH MUHAMMAD 2010 SCMR 36
• SHAHID ALI v. Mrs. AZIZ FATIMA 2010 PLD 38
• PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION v. S.M. ISMAIL NAQVI 2010 SCMR 42
• SHAKEEL v. State 2010 PLD 47

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Gharo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes