Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALTAT GAUHAR versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Article 11 (1) objection to the jurisdiction of the special court is pending in the appeal but the special court dismisses the appeal, unfair and dismissal as it acquits the appellant of undesirable charges.

1976 S C M R 405

Present: Muhammad Yaqub Ali, C. J., Salahuddin Ahmed, Muhammad Afzal Cheema, Muhammad Akram and Dorab Patel, JJ

ALTAF GAUHAR‑‑Appellant

versus

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS --Respondents

Criminal Appeal No. 26 of 1973 with C. M. Pr No. 246 of 1973, decided on 22nd January 1976.

(On appeal from the judgment of the Special Court of Pakistan, dated 4‑6‑1973).

Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Order, 1972‑‑

‑‑ Art. 11(1)‑Objection to jurisdiction of special Court pending decision in appeal but‑Special Court since acquitting appellant of impugned charges‑Appeal, held, anfractuous and dismissed as with drawn.

Maqbool Ahmad for M. A. Rahman, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 22nd January 1976.

JUDGMENT

MUHAMMAD AKRAM, J.‑

The Government of Pakistan, by means of a notification dated the 3rd January 1973, issued in pursuance of Article 3 of the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Order, 1972, directed that the appellant, Mr. Altaf Gauhar, be tried by the Special Court and on the 14th April 1973, forwarded the formal charges and statement of the allegations against the accused for his trial. In due course, the appellant put in appearance before the Special Court on the 21st May 1973, and filed a petition questioning the very jurisdiction of that Court to hold the trial or punish him. But the Special Court by a detailed order dated the 4th June 1973, found no force in the preliminary objections thus raised by the appellant and repelled them as untenable. In these circumstances, the appellant filed the above appeal against the order in this Court under Article 11 (1) of the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Order, 1972, But now the appellant his filed a miscellaneous petition to the effect that the Special Court has, on the 31st December 1973, acquitted him of the charges, this appeal has, therefore, become infructuous and may be dismissed as withdrawn. We see no objection to the grant of this prayer made before us.

The above appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.