Article 10 (2A) contempt of court Ordinance (IV of 2003), Section 20 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 270 AA Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O III, RR 4, 5 & OV, R 3 Office object entertain and maintain The Supreme Court Office's Appeal Scope Institution Officer raised the objection to the appeal filed by the appellant that it was not entertaining because Pallia was dismissed by the appellant under the same law as the Institution Officer. No objection could be raised. Funnily enough were those who could take office and decide at a reasonable level under the authority of a governing authority and could be further treated under the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 while maintaining The objection was the same, which was either taken up by the office or the decision of the court itself was to be made by the Court Contempt of Court Act 1976, it was repealed in the specific language of Section 20 of the contempt court. The Court Ordinance, 2003, which was protected by the addition of Article 270 AA to the Constitution, cannot be properly submitted by the office under which the Institution Officer, under the provisions of the law repealed under the Seventh Amendment. Supreme Court refuses to intervene in office Appeal dismissed
