Find a Lawyer

ARBAB KHAN versus STATE

Section 21 L & 10 (11A) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 9 and 10 (1) was declared absent by the trial court after the trial court declared the accused to be absent. Was. A framework was filed against the accused under Section 21L of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. No evidence was filed to substantiate the contents of section 21L above. No point of commitment was made on the said offense, it was not discussed by the trial court in the trial decision. For any evidence available on record, the accused was unlawfully convicted and convicted under Section 21L of the said Act, the procedure adopted by the trial court was illegal and by law Was not guaranteed, otherwise the case against the accused in absentia was violation of Arts 9 and 10. (1) Sections 10 (11A) of the Constitution and the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 were acquitted

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• SECRETARY (SCHOOLS), GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT v. YASMEEN BANO 2010 SCMR 739
• VICTOR RESTAURANT through Partners v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 SCMR 745
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2010 PLD 745
• ATTIQUE AHMED KAMAL v. State 2010 SCMR 748
• HUMAN RIGHTS CASES NOS.4668 OF 2006, 1111 OF 2007 and 15283-G of 2010 2010 PLD 759
• Mst. FATEH BIBI v. Mst. FATIMA BIBI 2010 SCMR 760
• MUHAMMAD AMJAD v. Dr. ISRAR AHMED 2010 PLC(CS) 760
• UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES v. MUMTAZ AHMAD 2010 SCMR 767

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

property advocates from Dudial lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes