Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus YASIN


O XXVI The Supreme Court of Appeal for the Leave Appeal rejected and upheld the High Court's order (despite the appeal of the Special Appeal was rejected) and the holder therefore revised the Petition Field. To complain to the Supreme Court. Proper Treatment of Misunderstanding: Referring to the High Court for Enforcement of Rules [Review]

1976 S C M R 60

Present :Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Salahuddin Ahmed, JJ

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN - Petitioner

versus

Syed YASIN‑Respondent/Applicant

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-40 of 1974, decided on 13th August 1975.

(In the matter of a miscellaneous application can the order of the Court diced 5‑9‑1974).

Supreme Court Rules, 1956--

----O. XXVI‑‑‑Review Petition for Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court and decree of High Court upheld‑Decree (despite rejection of petition for Special heave to Appeal) not satisfied and decree‑holder therefore making complaint to Supreme Court by way of review petition field: review petition misconceived proper remedy: to approach High Court for implementation of decree. [ Review ].

Nemo for Petitioner.

Applicant in person.

Date of hearing : 13th August 1975.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.

- Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑40 of 1974 was dismissed by the Court on 5‑9-1974. The present petitioner was the respondent in that petition. He seeks directions from the Court that on the basis of the decree Obtained lay him which was upheld by this Court, he is entitled to arrears of salary for 2 years but the Government of Pakistan has failed to reimburse him so far.

The proper remedy open to the petitioner it the circumstances, is to apply to the Government or to file a Writ petition in the High Court for implementation of the terms of the decree. The present petition misconceived and in dismissed as such.

Petition Dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.