Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-40 of 1974, decided on 13th August 1975.
(In the matter of a miscellaneous application can the order of the Court diced 5‑9‑1974).
----O. XXVI‑‑‑Review Petition for Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court and decree of High Court upheld‑Decree (despite rejection of petition for Special heave to Appeal) not satisfied and decree‑holder therefore making complaint to Supreme Court by way of review petition field: review petition misconceived proper remedy: to approach High Court for implementation of decree. [ Review ].
Nemo for Petitioner.
Applicant in person.
Date of hearing : 13th August 1975.
- Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑40 of 1974 was dismissed by the Court on 5‑9-1974. The present petitioner was the respondent in that petition. He seeks directions from the Court that on the basis of the decree Obtained lay him which was upheld by this Court, he is entitled to arrears of salary for 2 years but the Government of Pakistan has failed to reimburse him so far.
The proper remedy open to the petitioner it the circumstances, is to apply to the Government or to file a Writ petition in the High Court for implementation of the terms of the decree. The present petition misconceived and in dismissed as such.
Petition Dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer