HAJI BAKHTAWAR SAID MUHAMMAD versus MST. DUR-E-SHAHWAR BEGUM
Sections 6, 7 and 14 of the Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2b) trial court on the ground that the Qazif (Enforcement Head) Ordinance had refused to be charged under section 7 of 1979 because the petitioner. Had During the marriage provision, the defendant was charged with adultery, etc., and that the dispute between husband and wife was brought to the notice in section 14 of the said ordinance when the Federal Shari'a court heard from the defendant. The order was filed, accepting the revised petition and setting aside its order. The trial and remand of the trial and the direction of the trial under Sections 6 and 7 of the Criminal Offense (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance 1979, and the litigation between husband and wife (between the parties) confessed. The day ended when the applicant divorced the defendant and the facts of the divorce disclosed by the applicant were incorporated in the initial period. Strengthened under Section 202, the PC had disclosed that the applicant and the respondent were only a man and a woman, not a husband and wife, when the applicant made three written statements to his older brother and allegedly in his own home. The panchayat was also in front, accusing the defendant of adultery and clearly alleging that all three of his children were illegitimate children. The applicant's action, therefore, clearly attracted the provisions of Sections 6 and 7 of the Qadhaf (Enforcement Limitation) Ordinance 1979 and there is no question of being attracted to this ordinance in the case of attracting this ordinance. Accordingly, the petitioner was refused by the Supreme Court
