Sections 39, 46, 52 and 64 Election Request In the re-counting of ballot papers, the candidate / unqualified candidate was upset for the re-counting of the ballot papers in the election. The applicant's request was accepted, but the returning officer again Counting operation limited to only two polling stations. Then without disclosing the grounds in the order sheet, the Returning Officer again limited the count to only one polling station, while the applicant took the arrest and said that all the polling stations had a wrong calculation or a wrong count. As a result the Returning Officer had shown that, in regards to the re-counting, errors in counting of votes were made by the Presiding Officers of various polling stations; Done, but in reality the recalculation was limited to only one polling result Y The station, without any reason for such reduction, to the extent that the counting was considered by the Returning Officer on the recording, thereby conflicting with the recalculation of such correctional order regarding the default properties which The request for a recalculation petition was accepted, citing the parties 'willingness to restrict the process of re-counting on the two parties' consent to the polling stations, a further restriction on the re-counting of a polling station. It was not proven, even for a polling station where the re-counting was done by the returning officer. Tyjh is wrong with the votes and concluded that the respondents / Egyptians retired candidate
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2011
