DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY versus ISMAIL H. ZAKARIA
Sections 11, 16, 21 and 22 of the Environmental Sampling Rules, 2001, R8 (2) were filed by the Environmental Pollution Authority for wastewater generated by a mill complaint that waste mill samples test And after analysis, it has been observed that biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, grease and oil levels were higher than national environmental standards. That the wastewater produced by the mill was discharged into the atmosphere without any domestic treatment, which was badly polluting the water quality of the canals. And it said that dirty water is not only affecting the environment of the area, but also causing water-borne diseases to a large part of the population living in the mill, according to the section of Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 11 was involved in a violation. And given that the mill was inspected twice and the results at both times exceeded national environmental standards, no one supported the allegations that the complainant / prosecutor had filed with the Environmental Protection Agency team. Didn't test any of the members. The prosecution of the mill was examined in support of their case. The mill's case was that no samples were taken by the Environmental Protection Agency. In each document, different sample numbers and identities were mentioned, explaining the contradiction in the sample ID, and the prosecution's case was dealt a fatal blow. Six days after the aforementioned samples were collected, the laboratory samples were received and it was said that there was no plausible explanation for the unusual delay.
