Find a Lawyer

KIRAN SHAHZADI versus QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD

Article 199 Constitutional Application Declaration of Educational Institutions Results The Petitioner was a Respondent University student and complained that the University did not allow him to appear in "comprehension paper" and Viva Voce, while announcing his findings to the University. Was instructed. The waiver of compensation and his appearance in the examination made it right that the applicant had six opportunities to appear in the examination under the rules of the University, but the result of his papers was not disclosed to Tine by the University. It was announced when copies of the papers had been prepared. Before the High Court, therefore, the applicant cannot be held liable for the exclusion of the possibility that the applicant's attendance in the recent examination should be considered as one of the six opportunities available to him under the rules of the University. Because the applicant had already appeared in the compiled paper. So recently, the High Court instructed the University to allow it to appear in the oral voice and announce the results accordingly the application was allowed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2011

• RAHAT ALI SHERWANI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Housing and Works 2011 PLC(CS) 1277
• ALI AKBAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division 2011 PLC(CS) 1329
• MCB BANK LIMITED v. MILLENNIUM SECURITIES AND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED 2011 CLD 1355
• Syed HAMID SAEED KAZMI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1357
• GHULAM FAREED v. MUHAMMAD DIN RANA 2011 PCrLJ 1388
• Syed QAZIM ABBAS v. INTERIOR MINISTRY through Secretary 2011 CLC 1404
• Moulana ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2011 MLD 1439
• Syed ZAHIR SHAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior 2011 MLD 1451

All Islamabad judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Lodhran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes