Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

THE MULTAN TRANSPORT CO. LTD. versus DOST CORPORATION (2) R. T. A. MULTAN


West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Act 1939 Section 57 (5) Whether the appropriate public notice of the date for the public hearing, where the objection was not served by the company and the public notice in the newspaper for the date of the public hearing, was minimal (only one In this case only), the record did not show that the objectionable company was heard, the Regional Transport Authority's decision to grant the permit to another company was set aside.

P L D (Rev.) 1956 W. P. 50

Before Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue

THE MULTAN TRANSPORT Co. LTD.‑Appellant

Versus

(1) THE WEST PAKISTAN TRANSPORT Co. (REGD.)

(2) R. T. A., MULTAN‑Respondent

Appellate Side No. 22 of 1955‑56, decided on 1st March, 1956, District R. T. A., Multan.

Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939)------

-----

S. 47 (1) (c)‑New permits to new company‑Not justified in absence of data necessitating additional facilities.

A Regional Transport Authority is not justified in granting new permits in the absence of statistical data necessitating provision for additional facilities to the public. Two con siderations must be kept in view: (1) that new permits should not be granted at the expense of the existing company and (2) that the existing company should not be allowed to enjoy a monopoly in transport.

Kh. Abdur Rahim for Appellant.

Sh. Bashir Ahmad for Respondent.

Leghari, Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Multan for Respondent (2).

ORDER

NASIR AHMAD.

‑The Regional Transport Authority Multan in their meeting held on 9th December 1955, granted two permits to the West Pakistan Transport Company to ply between Multan and Jehanian. The appellants i.e., the Multan Transport Company Ltd., who are in a way monopolists on this route have come up in appeal.

The main ground taken up is that efficient transport services are already supplied by the appellants and there is hardly any need for increase in transport facilities. In any case the respondent company are a new concern, have already been given sufficient business and need not be enriched any further. The main consideration which has to be kept in mind is whether the public do need an increase in transport facilities if so, further facilities should be provided but not at the expense of the existing transport company. Further it might be advisable to bring in new concerns in transport so that existing transport companies are not made into monopolist combines or cartels. The general impression that I get from the Secretary R. T. A. is that greater transport facilities are needed as the number of travelling public is steadily going up at an increasing rate. Unfortunately none of the Regional Transport Authorities have collected reliable data which would indicate the extent of this increase though this should have been one of their primary concerns before granting new route permits. Jehanian undoubtedly is an important town in the Multan District and needs connection with Multan which is the headquarters of the district and also of the Division. Both are good business centres. In the absence of any data, it is nevertheless difficult to judge accurately whether the action taken by the Regional Transport Authority in granting two new route permits is justified or not. I' have already observed in some appeals to‑day that it would be advisable for the Regional Transport Authorities in the absence of any reliable statistics to proceed slowly in increasing transport facilities so that the provisions of section 47 (1) (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act are duly kept in view. One of the ways to persuade the Regional Transport Authority to follow a scientific method, is to accept the appeal and direct that they should reconsider the matter after collecting reliable statistical information regarding the extent of increase in the number of travelling public so that they are able to gauge more accurately what the requirements are for which they should make the necessary arrangements and I order accordingly. The Regional Transport Authority will undoubtedly keep in mind the claims of the existing transport companies and also of the West Pakistan Transport company.

A. H. Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Phalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.