Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAMSUDDIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 1 read with the amount of Section 49 and Section 9 read, the amount of security, alleged that a poor little Class IV employee was granted bail in judicial lockup. Is, the amount of security has been reduced, in case]
1976 P Cr. L J 855

[Lahore]

Before Javed Iqbal, J

SHAMSUDDIN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent.

Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 210/M, 211/M in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4727/B of 1975, decided on 25th April 1975.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ Ss. 49R & 499 read with S. 561‑A‑Security sum, reduction of‑Accused a poor petty Class IV employee lying in judicial lock‑up for want of sureties for a large sum‑Sum of security reduced, in circumstances.‑[Bail].

(b) Criminal trial‑

‑‑‑ Petition, amendment/correction of‑-Petition defective in particulars regarding number of section, case number as well as caste and address of petitioner‑Amendment and corrections allowed.

Bashir Ahmad Khan for Petitioners.

Kh. Muhammad Asghar‑I for the State.

ORDER

(Cr. Misc. No. 210/M of 1975)

Learned counsel states that he would have no objection if the sum of Security in the bail allowed to the petitioner is reduced to Rs. 50,000 fifty thousand only). It is submitted that the co‑accused of the petitioner are rich whereas Muhammad Yousaf petitioner is very poor man, Class IV employee and that, therefore, being unable to procure accordingly reduced. The petitioner Muhammad Yousaf shall be released urn bail subject to his furnishing security in the Burn of Rs. 50,90 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Lahore.

This petition stands disposed of.

Cr. Misc. No. 211/M of 1975

It is submitted that in respect of Muhammad Yousaf petitioner there were mistakes in the petition filed on his behalf. Theta were that instead of section 46 7, P. P. C., section 468, P. P. C. was written in the petition the caste of the petitioner was described as Sheikh, resident of Chaudhry Park, G. T. Road, Shahdara, Lahore, whereas his caste in fact was Qureshi and he was resident of Dev Samaj Building, Dev Samaj Road, Ramnagar, Lahore. In addition, was also to he mentioned in the petitions that Case No. 706/3, Police Station New Anarkali/Crime Branch, had also begin made. Learned counsel wants that these correction be made in this previous order. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. Order as prayed. This petition stands disposed of.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.