JAMAL NAVEED PAPER MILLS, KHANEWAL versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN
The Appeal / Taxpayer of the Constitution of Clauses 2 (46), 7, 11 and 46 of the Evaluation Committee claimed that it was a necessary condition for the formation of the Evaluation Committee under Section 2 (46) of the Sales Tax Act 1990. There should be plenty of reason to do so. That the sales tax invoice was not correctly announced in the sales tax. While no such charge was ever levied against the appellant / taxpayer as the department did not bring in any such invoice record in which the value of the supply was not properly declared by the taxpayers in the invoices. The cost per kilogram of bamboo paper announced was Rs.50 per kg and the profit earned was 12% on the taxpayers' account of the profit and loss of the appeal memorandum, which will be available on the coming of the flute paper. All costs were mentioned as well as the cost of goods sold. The cost per kilogram produced by the taxpayer for the flute paper was Rs 8 88 per kg, and according to the adjusting authority 8 kg per kg could not be sold. The department, from which it is claimed that the cost was denied or calculated, was, in the circumstances, speculative and speculative, disagreeing, and therefore, the same price would not be accepted. The flute paper, announced by the other manufacturing units in the territorial jurisdiction of the same office and other clerical / regional tax offices, was exactly what the taxpayer announced by the taxpayer. Issue this issue with other units
