Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISLABAD versus BASHIR PRINTING INDUS., FAISALABAD

Section 10 and 46 Refund Claims Registered Individual, engaged in the manufacture and export of textile products, Refunds for the June, 2004 period against input tax payable on raw materials used in the manufacture of taxable goods. Claims, Assistant Collector Rejected Sales Tax (Seed Refund Claim). The refund was accepted by the Collector of Appeal (Appeals), the department filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal for the registered person to advise the lawyer that the appellants arising out of the same impugned order were sent to the Tribunal. Was already excluded, for reasons. This order was actually upheld because the order was actually approved 260 days after the issuance of the showcase notice. The basis of the appeal was the same order which was already valid and which was banned. Because the present appeal was also dismissed for that reason.

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• COTTON ARTS (PVT.) LTD. v. COLLECTOR SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1548
• MYKA STEEL (PVT) LTD. v. COLLECTOR, SALES TAX & FEDERAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR 2011 PTD 1588
• TAJ PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. v. C.I.R. (R.T.O.), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1625
• NAVEED ENTERPRISES, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (RTO), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1629
• NIAGRA MILLS (PVT.) LTD, FAISALABAD v. COLLECTOR (APPEALS), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1656
• BASHIR PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. C.I.R. (RTO), FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1669
• INTERLOOP (PVT.) LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD 2011 PTD 1680
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CO. LTD, ISLAMABAD v. DCIT, CIR-11, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1716

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

law websites from Mastoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes