Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD LODHI versus

Sections 10 and 15 of the Sindh Chief Court Rules (O section), R586 (2) declaration of invoice book of accounts, the absence of the effect applicant was a highly competent person, especially a banker and he had varied his career. Serve with banks. Applicant failed to meet the requirements of R586 (2) of the Sindh High Court Rules, (A Section), for assuming that the applicant did not maintain his own account books and was entitled to anonymity. No, the application was dismissed in the case

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ALI HASSAN v. State 2011 YLR 846
• DOLLAR INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Abdullah Feroz v. NISAR TRADERS 2011 CLD 847
• ILYAS v. State 2011 MLD 849
• NOOR MUHAMMAD alias NOORO v. State 2011 YLR 852
• ATTA MUHAMMAD v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, SANGHAR 2011 MLD 856
• NAEEM v. State 2011 YLR 858
• JAWAID MASAUD AHMED KHAN v. ISLAMUDDIN 2011 MLD 860
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. State 2011 PCrLJ 864

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Kacha Khooh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes